{"id":25106801,"date":"2022-10-10T05:49:00","date_gmt":"2022-10-10T03:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/labidikm.net\/?p=25106801"},"modified":"2025-04-24T15:26:27","modified_gmt":"2025-04-24T13:26:27","slug":"between-critique-and-criticism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/labidikm.net\/en\/between-critique-and-criticism\/","title":{"rendered":"Critique of Critique: Between Critique and Criticism"},"content":{"rendered":"

Critique of Critique: Between Critique and Criticism<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Peace be upon those who follow reason, abandon blind imitation, and think\u2026 Greetings.<\/p>\n

There is no doubt that critique<\/a> is necessary, regardless of the idea being discussed. However, when critique turns into a destructive<\/strong> tool that aims only to tear down without offering constructive solutions, it becomes even more dangerous than the idea being criticized\u2014no matter how flawed that idea may be.<\/p>\n

Critique is both a science and an art<\/strong>. It has rules and conditions<\/strong> that must be followed, and at the same time, there is a methodology<\/strong> that distinguishes a professional critic from an amateur.<\/p>\n

One of the primary goals of critique<\/strong> is to provide alternatives or better solutions<\/strong>. Any form of critique that exists only for the sake of criticism<\/strong> is nothing more than a denunciation of flaws<\/strong>, with the sole purpose of condemning an idea and belittling those who believe in it<\/strong>. This is an aggressive act<\/strong> rather than a constructive one.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, in our region, we do not<\/strong> clearly distinguish between critique (\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0642\u062f)<\/strong> and criticism (\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u062a\u0642\u0627\u062f)<\/strong>, even though the Arabic language itself makes a clear distinction between the two<\/strong>.<\/p>\n